Portrait of Jane Austen, 1873
Courtesy of University of Texas/Wikimedia Commons
Enough! Please! We get it. I’ve written it myself several times. Jane Austen is a serious—and seriously great—figure of seriously great literature. Don’t diminish her work by calling it chick lit! Did I mention she’s a very, very, serious (but brilliantly comic and satiric) author?
But it’s begun to seem like she’s now assumed the role of the designated
highbrow writer for light readers. It’s not that she’s overrated. It’s that
she’s in dire jeopardy of being overhyped—and dumbed down in the
process.
I know that sounds elitist, and I hasten to assert that my admiration for her
fiction is deep, sincere, undiminished. But I’ve begun to feel—in the midst of
the tsunami of schlocky, rapturous, over-the-top, wall-to-wall multiplatform
celebration of the 200th anniversary of Pride and Prejudice—that it’s all a bit too much.
Something quiet and true about Austen is being lost in the trumpet blasts and
the spin-offs.
Did you see the story in the Wall Street Journal recently? Cleverly
titled “Austen Power,” it highlighted some cringe-making,
Austen-derived phenomena linked to the Pride and Prejudice
bicentennial:
—EROTICA: Linda Berdoll’s sequel to Pride &
Prejudice would make Jane Austen blush.
—WEB: On YouTube’s ‘Lizzie Bennet Diaries’ the characters have Facebook and Twitter feeds,
—TV: On the fantasy show “Lost in Austen” a fan swaps places with Elizabeth Bennet.
—FILM: “Austenland” just sold at Sundance, follows an Austen fan who falls in love at a theme park.
—WEB: On YouTube’s ‘Lizzie Bennet Diaries’ the characters have Facebook and Twitter feeds,
—TV: On the fantasy show “Lost in Austen” a fan swaps places with Elizabeth Bennet.
—FILM: “Austenland” just sold at Sundance, follows an Austen fan who falls in love at a theme park.
And finally, I guess inevitably: Pride and Prejudice and Kitties.
“For those who like their Regency romances with funny pictures of cats.” (This
is not my joke. Alas.)
Full article at Slate
Full article at Slate
No comments:
Post a Comment